RECOVER Clinical Study Shows Meaningful Benefits of LivaNova’s VNS Therapy System in Select Secondary Endpoints for Unipolar Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression
Results published in two articles in Brain Stimulation
A total of 493 adults with at least four documented unsuccessful attempts with antidepressant treatments participated in the unipolar cohort of the RECOVER study. At baseline, unipolar patients in the study failed more than 13 antidepressant treatments (on average) – this included, for the majority, one or more interventional therapies (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, or esketamine). While the RECOVER study did not meet the primary endpoint due to a strong and unforeseen response in the sham group, the active treatment arm demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement from the treatment arm’s baseline. Further, the RECOVER study demonstrated statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits in select secondary endpoints for this cohort. Based upon these findings and the positive effects for those
“Participants in the trial had severe, refractory depression that could not be treated effectively with other FDA-approved treatments, and most have had large portions of their lives profoundly negatively impacted by depression,” said
The first article, “Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A One-Year, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial,”1 outlines the safety and effectiveness of adjunctive VNS Therapy in treating patients with unipolar TRD. The primary endpoint measured the difference in the percentage of time in antidepressant response between active VNS Therapy and sham VNS Therapy, with response defined as at least a 50% reduction from baseline using the
Analyses of secondary endpoints revealed antidepressant benefits significantly favoring active VNS Therapy as opposed to sham VNS Therapy as measured by ratings from on-site clinicians (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement, or CGI-I), patients themselves (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology–Self Report, or QIDS-SR), and offsite masked raters (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology–Clinical, or QIDS-C).
Results included:
- Participants with active VNS Therapy had significantly more percentage of time in response with CGI-I (P=0.004) and QIDS-SR (P=0.049) compared with sham VNS Therapy.
- For percentage of time in partial response, active VNS Therapy showed significant benefit with QIDS-C (P=0.006) and CGI-I (P<0.001) compared with sham VNS Therapy. Partial response is defined as improvement of ≥30% from baseline for QIDS-C or a score of ≤3 for CGI-I.
- No differences between treatment groups were observed in suicidal ideation and intent as measured by the S-STS2 items 6 and 8 (P=0.239).
“The composite of the mood findings, especially in the partial response rates on multiple ratings scales, along with the low rate of adverse events, support that this device demonstrated safe antidepressant efficacy for these patients,” said Conway.
The second article, “Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Daily Function and Quality of Life in Markedly Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: Findings from a One-Year, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial,”3 assesses VNS Therapy’s ability to improve quality of life (QoL) and daily function in patients with unipolar TRD. The results of this analysis demonstrated that adjunctive VNS Therapy provided greater improvements in QoL and daily function in patients with unipolar TRD when compared with sham VNS Therapy.
Results included:
- The active VNS Therapy group showed greater improvements over the sham control group as measured by the mean change in scores from baseline in the Mini-Q-LES-Q4 (P=0.050) and WPAI5 item 6 (health condition’s effect on regular activities; P=0.050) used as continuous variables.
- Time spent in a state of clinically meaningful benefit was significantly greater with active VNS Therapy compared to sham VNS Therapy, using the Q-LES-Q6 (P=0.029), Mini-Q-LES-Q (P=0.011) and WPAI item 6 (P=0.039).
- No differences between treatment groups were observed in the mean change in score from baseline with the WHODAS7 2.0 (P=0.304) and the EQ-5D8 visual analog scale (P=0.125).
“Adjunctive VNS Therapy improves quality of life and psychosocial function in patients with major depression
These two articles published in Brain Stimulation are the first in a series that will detail the RECOVER unipolar cohort data. Three subsequent, supportive manuscripts will feature outcomes from in-depth data analyses on select secondary endpoints. The totality of data presented in these five complementary articles will serve as the basis for LivaNova’s formal request to the
“Patients in the RECOVER study are some of the most critically ill among those with treatment-resistant depression and they need more treatment options when existing therapies fail,” said Vladimir Makatsaria, Chief Executive Officer of
RECOVER launched in 2019 as part of a Coverage with
About RECOVER
LivaNova’s VNS Therapy™ System has been approved for the treatment of depression since earning CE Mark in 2001 and 510(k) from the
The largest randomized clinical study of its kind, RECOVER is examining up to 1,000 patients ages 18 or older
About VNS Therapy for Depression
The VNS Therapy™ System, Symmetry™, is
References
- Conway CR, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: A one-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimulation.
Dec. 18, 2024 . DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1191. - The Sheehan Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) is a clinician-administered rating scale that tracks treatment-emergent suicidal ideation and behaviors.
- Rush AJ, et al. Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on daily function and quality of life in markedly treatment-resistant major depression: Findings from a one-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimulation.
Dec. 18, 2024 . DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1187. - Mini-Q-LES-Q (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire – Short Form) is a quality-of-life measure from a self-report assessing the patient’s degree of enjoyment and satisfaction across seven domains as a subset of the Q-LES-Q.
- WPAI item 6 is a function measure from the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire.
- Q-LES-Q is a quality-of-life measure from a self-report assessing the patient’s degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced over the previous seven days across 14 domains.
- WHODAS (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule) assesses the patient’s ability to perform activities in the previous month in six domains.
- The EuroQoL Five-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a generic QoL measure that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
About
Safe Harbor Statement
This news release contains “forward-looking statements” concerning the Company’s goals, beliefs, expectations, strategies, objectives, plans, underlying assumptions, and other statements that are not necessarily based on historical facts. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the RECOVER study and the VNS Therapy™ System, Symmetry™. Actual events may differ materially from those indicated in our forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those factors set forth in Item 1A of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as supplemented by any risk factors contained in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241217812430/en/
LivaNova Investor Relations and Media Contacts
+1 281-895-2382
VP, Investor Relations
InvestorRelations@livanova.com
VP, Corporate Communications
Corporate.Communications@livanova.com
Source: